Abstract
Let R be a ring and U be a Lie ideal of R. Suppose that σ, τ are endomorphisms of R. A family D = {d_{n}}_{n ∈ N}of additive mappings d_{n}:R → R is said to be a (σ,τ) higher derivation of U into R if d_{0} = I_{R}, the identity map on R and
Keywords:
Derivation; Higher derivation; Jordan  higher derivation; Lie idealIntroduction
Throughout (σ,τ) the present paper R will denote an associative ring with center Z(R). For any x,y ∈ R denote the commutator xy − yx by [x,y]. Recall that a ring R is prime if aRb = {0} implies that a = 0 or b = 0. An additive subgroup U of R is said to be a Lie ideal of R if [U,R] ⊆ U. A Lie ideal U of R is said to be a square closed Lie ideal of R if u^{2}∈U for all u∈U. An additive mapping d:R→R is said to be a derivation (resp. Jordan derivation) of R if d(xy) = d(x)y + xd(y)(resp. d(x^{2}) = d(x)x + xd(x)) holds for all x,y ∈ R. Now let D = {d_{n}}_{n ∈ N} be a family of additive mappings d_{n}:R. Following Hasse and Schimdt (→ R1937), D is said to be a higher derivation (resp. Jordan higher derivation) on R if d_{0} = I_{R}(the identity map on R) and
Inspired by the notion of (σ,τ) derivation the authors together with Haetinger (2010) introduced the concept of a (σ,τ) higher derivation as follows: A family D = {d_{n}}_{n ∈ N} of additive mappings d_{n}:R → R is said to be a (σ,τ) higher derivation of R if d_{0} = I_{R} and
Following Bres̆ar (1991), an additive mapping F:R→Ris said to be a generalized derivation if there exists a derivation d:R→R such that F(xy) = F(x)y + xd(y) holds for all x, y ∈ R. Motivated by the definition of generalized derivation the notion of generalized
higher derivation was introduced by Cortes and Haetinger (2005). A family F = {f_{n}}_{n ∈ N}of additive maps f_{n}:R→Ris said to be a generalized higher derivation of R if there exists a higher derivation D = {d_{n}}_{n ∈ N} of R such that f_{0} = I_{R} and
An additive mapping F:R→R is said to be a generalized (σ,τ)inner derivation if F(x) = σ(x)b + aτ(x) holds for some fixed a, b ∈ R and for all x ∈ R. If F is a generalized (σ,τ)inner derivation, a simple computation yields that F(xy) = σ(x)d_{−b}(y) + F(x)τ(y), where d_{−b} is a (σ,τ)inner derivation. With this point of view an additive mapping F:R→R is said to be a generalized (σ,τ)derivation on R if there exists a (σ,τ)derivation d:R→R such that F(xy) = σ(x)d(y) + F(x)τ(y) holds for all x,y ∈ R. For such an example let S be any ring and
In view of the above definition we introduce the analogue of (σ,τ)higher derivation in a more general setting.
Let σ,τ be endomorphims of R. A family F = {f_{n}}_{n ∈ N} of additive maps f_{n}:R→R is said to be generalized (σ,τ)higher derivation (resp. generalized Jordan (σ,τ)higher derivation) of R if there exists a (σ,τ)higher derivation D = {d_{n}}_{n ∈ N} of R such that f_{0} = I_{R} and
Let U be a Lie ideal of R. Then F is said to be a generalized (σ,τ)higher derivation (resp. generalized Jordan (σ,τ)higher derivation) of U into R if the above corresponding conditions are satisfied for all a, b ∈ U.
Example 1.1. Let R be an algebra over the field of rationals and σ,τ be the endomorphisms of R. Define
If we choose the underlying f to be a generalized Jordan (σ,τ)−derivation on R which is not a generalized (σ,τ)−derivation on R then one can easily construct an example of a generalized Jordan (σ,τ)− higher derivation on R which is not a generalized (σ,τ)− higher derivation on R.
It is easy to see that every derivation on R is a Jordan derivation but the converse need not be true in general. A wellknown result due to Herstein (2002) states that every Jordan derivation on a prime ring of characteristic different from two is a derivation. This result was further generalized by many authors in various directions (see Ashraf et al. 2001; Bres̆ar and Vukman 1991where further references can be found). Motivated by these results Ferrero and Haetinger (2002) generalized Herstein’s theorem for higher derivations and proved that every Jordan higher derivation on a prime ring of characteristic different from two is a higher derivation. The authors together with Haetinger (Ashraf et al. 2010) further generalized the above result in the setting of (σ,τ)higher derivation of R. The main objective of the present paper is to find the conditions on R under which every generalized Jordan (σ,τ)higher derivation of R is a generalized (σ,τ)higher derivation of R. In fact our results generalize, extend and compliment several results obtained earlier in this direction.
Main results
Recently, Haetinger (2002) proved that if R is a prime ring of characteristic different from 2 and U a square closed Lie ideal such that U⫅̸Z(R). Then every Jordan higher derivation of U into R is a higher derivation of U into R. The following theorem shows that the above result still holds for arbitrary square closed Lie ideal of R that is, U may be central.
Theorem 2.1. Let R be a prime ring such that char(R) ≠ 2 and U be a square closed Lie ideal of R. Suppose that σ,τ are endomorphisms of R such that στ = τσ and τ is oneone & onto. Then every generalized Jordan (σ,τ)higher derivation of U into R is a generalized (σ,τ)higher derivation of U into R.
In order to develop the proof of the theorem, we begin with the following known lemma:
Lemma 2.1. ((Ferrero and Haetinger 2002), Lemma 2.3) Assume that R is a 2torsion free prime ring and U a square closed Lie ideal of R such that U⫅̸Z(R). Let G_{1},G_{2},⋯,G_{n}be additive groups, S:G_{1}×G_{2}×⋯×G_{n}→R and T:G_{1}×G_{2}×⋯×G_{n}→ R be the mappings which are additive in each argument. If S(a_{1},a_{2},⋯,a_{n})xT(a_{1},a_{2},⋯,a_{n}) = 0 for every x ∈ U, a_{i}∈G_{i}, i = 1,2,⋯,n then S(a_{1},a_{2},⋯,a_{n}) = 0 for every a_{i}∈G_{i}, i = 1,2,⋯,nor T(b_{1},b_{2},⋯,b_{n}) = 0 for every b_{i}∈G_{i}, i = 1,2,⋯,n.
Lemma 2.2. Let R be a ring and σ, τ be endomorphisms of R such that στ = τσ and F = {f_{n}}_{n ∈ N}be a generalized Jordan (σ,τ)higher derivation of U into R with associated (σ,τ)higher derivation D = {d_{n}}_{n ∈ N} of U into R. Then for all u, v, w ∈ U and each fixed n ∈ N we have for all u, v, w ∈ U.
(i)
If R is a 2torsion free ring then,
(ii)
(iii)
Proof. (i) For u, v ∈ U, n ∈ N we have,
for all u, v ∈ U. Again;
for all u, v ∈ U.Comparing the above expressions and reordering the indices we obtain the required result.
(ii) Since uv + vu = (u + v)^{2}−u^{2}−v^{2}∈U, using (i) and replacing v by uv + vu we find that,
On the other hand,
Comparing the equations (2.1) and (2.2) and reordering the indices and using the fact that R is 2torsion free we get the required result.
(iii) Linearizing the above result, we have
Again,
Comparing (2.3) & (2.4) and using the fact that R is 2torsion free we get the required result.
For every fixed n ∈ N and for each u,v∈U we denote by Φ_{n}(u,v) the element of R such that
It can also be seen that the function Φ_{n}is additive in both the arguments.
Lemma 2.3. Let R be a 2torsion free ring and σ,τbe endomorphisms of R such that στ = τσ. Let F = {f_{n}}_{n ∈ N}be a generalized Jordan (σ,τ)higher derivation of U into R with associated (σ,τ)higher derivation D = {d_{n}}_{n ∈ N}of U into R. If Φ_{m}(u,v) = 0, for each m<n and for all u,v∈U, then
(i) Φ_{n}(u,v)τ^{n}[u,v] = 0, for all u,v∈U
(ii) Φ_{n}(u,v)τ^{n}(w)τ^{n}[u,v] = 0, for all u,v,w∈U.
Proof.
(i) Since for any u,v∈U, uv + vu∈U and uv−vu∈U, we find that 2uv∈U. Suppose β = 4(uv(uv) + (uv)vu)∈U. Using Lemma 2.2(iii) we have,
Using the fact that Φ_{m}(u,v) = 0 for all m<n we have,
On the other hand,
Comparing (2.5) with (2.6) for f_{n}(β)we get Φ_{n}(u,v) × [τ^{n}(u),τ^{n}(v)] = 0 for all u, v ∈ U.
(ii) Let χ = 4(uvwvu + vuwuv) for u, v, w ∈ U. Then by Lemma 2.2(ii) we obtain
Again consider,
Applying Lemma 2.2(iii), we have
Equating (2.7) & (2.8) and using the fact that R is 2 torsion free we find that
Initially calculating the first term we have
Using the hypothesis that Φ_{m}(u,v) = 0 for all m < n.
Similarly the second term reduces to
Now, subtracting the equation (2.11) from (2.10) and using the hypothesis that στ = τσ we obtain
Similarly, the difference of the last two terms of equation (2.9) yields
Thus, (2.9) becomes Φ_{n}(u,v)τ^{n}(w)τ^{n}[u,v] = 0 for all u, v ∈ U.
We are now well equipped to prove our main theorem.
Proof of Theorem 2.1. Suppose that U is commutative. If U is commutative then U is also central (see the proof of Lemma 1.3 of (Herstein 1969)). We’ll proceed by induction on n. For n = 1, every generalized Jordan (σ,τ)higher derivation reduces to generalized Jordan (σ,τ)derivation and hence using Lemma 2.2(iii) of (Ashraf et al. 2001), we have
As U is commutative, in view of Lemma 2.2(i) of (Ashraf et al. 2001) we have
Since, d(uv) = d(vu) = σ(v)d(u) + d(v)τ(u), the above equation can be rewritten as
Comparing the equations (2.12) and (2.13) we obtain
As w is central and since τ is oneone and onto hence τ(w) is central but the center of a prime ring is free from zero divisors, the above equation implies that Φ_{1}(u,v) = 0 for all u, v ∈ U. Let Φ_{m}(u,v) = 0 for all u, v ∈ U and each m < n then from Lemma 2.2(iii), we have
for all u, v, w ∈ U.
Again by using Lemma 2.2(i) and commutativity of U, we get
Since U is commutative we find that d_{j}(τ^{n−j}(uv)) = d_{j}(τ^{n−j}(vu)) and as d_{j} is a (σ,τ)higher derivation the above equation can be written as
Comparing equations (2.15) and (2.14) we find that
Since Φ_{m}(u,v) = 0 for all u, v ∈ U, m < n, the above equation reduces to
Since w is central and as τ is oneone and onto, τ^{n}(w) is also central. But the center of a prime ring is free from the zero divisors, equation (2.16) implies that Φ_{n}(u,v) = 0 for all u, v ∈ U and each n ∈ N.
Now consider the possibility that U is noncommutative hence U⫅̸Z(R). Using Lemma 2.3(ii) we have Φ_{n}(u,v)τ^{n}(w)τ^{n}[u,v] = 0 for all u,v,w∈U. Since τ is oneone and onto, the relation yields that τ^{−n}(Φ_{n}(u,v))w[u,v] = 0 for all u,v,w∈U. Hence by Lemma 2.1, τ^{−n}(Φ_{n}(u,v)) = 0 for all u,v∈U or [u,v] = 0 for all u,v∈U. But since U is noncommutative, we find that Φ_{n}(u,v) = 0, for all u,v∈U and each n ∈ N.This completes the proof of our theorem.
As a consequence of the above result we find the following corollaries. Corollary 2.1 settle the conjecture given in (Ashraf et al. 2004) for a square closed Lie ideal while Corollary 2.2 improves the main Theorems of (Ashraf et al. (2010), Bres̆ar and Vukman (1988); Haetinger (2002)). □
Corollary 2.1. Let R be 2 torsion free prime ring and U a square closed Lie ideal of R. Suppose that θ,ϕ are endomorphisms of R such that ϕ is oneone, onto. If F:R→R is a generalized Jordan (θ,ϕ) derivation on U then F is a generalized (θ,ϕ) derivation on U.
Corollary 2.2. Let R be a prime ring such that char(R) ≠ 2 and U a square closed Lie ideal of R. Then every Jordan higher derivation of U into R is a higher derivation of U into R.
In the above theorem if the underlying ring is arbitrary, then we can prove the following:
Theorem 2.2. Let R be a 2 torsion free ring and U be a square closed Lie ideal of R. Suppose that σ,τ are endomorphisms of R such that στ = τσ and τ is oneone & onto. If U has a commutator which is not a right zero divisor, then every generalized Jordan (σ,τ)higher derivation of U into R is a generalized (σ,τ)higher derivation of U into R.
Proof. Let x,y∈U be the fixed elements such that c[x,y]=0⇒c = 0 for every c∈R. We’ll prove the result by induction on n.
We know that for n = 0, Φ_{0}(u,v) = 0. Hence proceeding by induction we can assume that Φ_{m}(u,v) = 0 for all m<n. Using Lemma 2.3(i) we have
The above equation implies that τ^{−n}(Φ_{n}(u,v))[u,v] = 0 for all u, v ∈ U. Hence in particular, τ^{−n}(Φ_{n}(x,y))[x,y] = 0. This implies that,
Replacing u by u + x in (2.17) we get
Again replacing v by y in (2.19) and using (2.18) we get Φ_{n}(u,y)[τ^{n}(x),τ^{n}(y)] = 0, for every u ∈ U,i.e., τ^{−n}(Φ_{n}(u,y))[x,y] = 0. This yields that
Replace v by v + y in (2.19), to get
Replacing u by x in (2.21) and using (2.18) we obtain Φ_{n}(x,v)[τ^{n}(x),τ^{n}(y)] = 0 for all v ∈U. This yields that
Combining (2.20), (2.21) and (2.22) we find that Φ_{n}(u,v)[τ^{n}(x),τ^{n}(y)] = 0 i.e., τ^{−n}(Φ_{n}(u,v))[x,y] = 0. Hence, we conclude that Φ_{n}(u,v) = 0 for all u,v∈U.This completes the proof of our theorem. □
Some special cases of the above theorem are already known and are of great interest.
Corollary 2.3. ((Ashraf et al. 2004), Theorem 2.3) Let R be a 2 torsion free prime ring and U a square closed Lie ideal of R. Suppose that σ,τ are endomorphisms of R such that τ is oneone, onto. Suppose further that U has a commutator which is not a zero divisor. If F:R→R is a generalized Jordan (σ,τ) derivation of U into R then F is a generalized (σ,τ) derivation of U into R.
Corollary 2.4. ((Cortes and Haetinger 2005), Theorem 1.3) Let R be a 2 torsion free ring such that R has a commutator which is not a right divisor and U a square closed Lie ideal of R. Then every generalized Jordan higher derivation of U into R is a generalized higher derivation of U into R.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author’s contributions
Both the authors, viz. MA and AK, with the consultation of each other, carried out this work and drafted the manuscript together. Both the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the referees for their useful suggestions.
This research is partially supported by a grant from the Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi (Grant no. SR/S4/MS:556/08)
References

Ashraf M, Ali A, Ali S (2004) On Lie ideals and generalized Jordan (θ,ϕ) derivations in prime rings. Commun Algebra 32:29772985 Publisher Full Text

Ashraf M, Khan A, Haetinger C (2010) On (σ,τ) higher derivations in prime rings. Internat Elect J Algebra 8:6579

Ashraf M, Quadri MA, Rehman N (2001) On Lie ideals and (σ,τ)Jordan derivations of prime rings. Tamkang J Math 31(4):247252

Bres̆ar M (1991) On the distance of the composition of two derivations to the generalized derivations. Glasgow Math J 33:8993 Publisher Full Text

Vukman J, Bres̆ar, M (1988) Jordan derivations on prime rings. Bull Austral Math Soc 37:321322 Publisher Full Text

Bres̆ar M, Vukman J (1991) Jordan (θ,ϕ)derivations. Glasnik Mat 26(46):1317

Cortes W, Haetinger C (2005) On Jordan generalized higher derivations in rings. Turk J Math 29(1):111

Ferrero M, Haetinger C (2002) Higher derivations and a theorem by Herstein. Questiones Mathematicae 25(2):249257 Publisher Full Text

Haetinger C (2000) Derivações de ordem superior em anéis primos e semiprimos.
Ph.D Thesis, IMUFRGS, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Haetinger, C (2002) Higher Derivations on Lie ideals. Tendências em Matemática Aplicada e Computacional 3(1):141145 PubMed Abstract

Hasse H, Schimdt FK (1937) Noch eine Begründung ger Theorie der höhr Differential quotenten in einem algebraischen Fünktiosenkörper einer Unbestimten. J Reine Angen Math 177:215237

Herstein IN (2002) Jordan derivations of prime rings. Proc Amer Math Soc 8:11041110

Herstein, IN (1969) Topics in Ring Theory. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.