Thermal decomposition of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ single-source precursor for the chemical vapour deposition of binary and ternary zinc chalcogenides: a theoretical study

Abstract

The mechanistic pathways for the formation of zinc selenide, zinc sulphide and ternary zinc selenide sulphide in the gas phase decomposition of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ single-source precursor has been explored on the singlet and doublet potential energy surfaces using density functional theory method in order to understand the thermodynamic and kinetic properties. The optimized geometries and the predicted energies were obtained using the M06 functional and a combination of the basis sets LACVP* for Zn and 6-31(d) for light atoms. The rate constants of each elementary reaction have been calculated using the transition state theory. The results indicate that the steps that lead to ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x formation on both the singlet and doublet potential energy surfaces is favoured kinetically and thermodynamically over those that lead to ZnSe and ZnS formation. Density functional theory calculations of the gas phase decomposition of the complex indicate that the deposition of ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x in chemical vapour deposition may involve more than one step but the steps that lead to its formation are consistent with a dominant role for both thermodynamic and kinetic factors. The theoretical study showed important insights as a general tool to anticipate the gas phase decomposition mechanism of a novel precursor when direct experimental measurements are not available.

Background

Transition metal chalcogenides have been of considerable technological applications such as solar energy conversion, solar control coatings, microelectronic devices, catalysts, sensors, optical filters and laser sources (Yamaguchi et al. 1996; Teteris 2003; Savadogo 1998; Sang et al. 2002). Structural information such as geometrical and electronic configurations, molecular dynamics, and thermodynamic and magnetic properties of the dichalcogenophosphinato complexes is important to understand the different factors influencing their practically useful properties (Artem’ev et al. 2014).

The mixed crystals of II–VI compound semiconductors have attracted much attention for applications in optical devices (El Haj Hassan et al. 2007). Indeed, the easiest way to change artificially the electronic and optical properties of semiconductors is by forming their alloys (Gunshor and Nurmikko 1997). It seems therefore very interesting to study ZnS and ZnSe mixed in the ZnS_xSe_1−x ternary alloys.

An experimental observation of labile and reactive intermediates on the surface is ultimately challenging and difficult, since the experiments have great difficulties in measuring the intermediates and the transition states in the high-temperature system with complicated reactions. Optimising the CVD conditions such that higher-purity materials are obtained at a higher growth rate requires knowledge of the deposition chemistry obtained by performing specially designed experiments and/or modelling and simulation (Opoku et al. 2014). Due to the difficulty of assessing such a reaction mechanism by experiment, theoretical calculations can be an excellent means of exploring these processes on a molecular scale. Knowledge of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters obtained from density function theory calculation is important to understand and optimise deposition conditions require for selective growth process in chemical vapour deposition. Therefore, understanding the kinetics of gas phase decomposition reactions of single source precursor is becoming more and more important. The good correspondence between DFT results and experimental data has led to DFT playing a pivotal role in the prediction of the reaction rates of complex species important for gas-phase reactions of single-source precursors (Hohenberg and Kohn 1964).

Data on the structural chemistry of the Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor are scarce. In particular, experimental investigations and quantum-chemical models of the Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor have not been reported. Opoku, Asare-Donkor and Adimado had studied the mechanisms of the gas phase decomposition of Cd[(ⁱPr)₂PSSe]₂, Pb[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ and Zn[(ⁱPr)₂PSSe]₂ single source precursors (Opoku et al. 2014; 2015a, b). In continuation of such efforts, we have analysed the decomposition behaviour of the zinc (II) thioselenophosphinate, Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ in the gas phase. A mechanism that consists of 24 reactions has been proposed to account for the gas-phase decomposition of the Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor. In this study we focus: (1) on theoretical studies performed to understand the reaction mechanisms of the Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ single-source precursor; (2) on computational studies performed to assess the performance of the precursor depending on the ligand employed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to show how the theoretical studies can be a crucial help to understand and predict reaction mechanisms, providing a detailed picture at atomistic level of the intermediates involved in the decomposition and unveiling the electronic and structural properties of the precursor (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Optimised structure of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ single-source precursor.

Computational details

All the calculations were done using the M06 hybrid density functional. The M06 is a novel hybrid meta functional with good accuracy and has been parameterized for modelling organometallic and inorganometallic thermochemistry, non-covalent interactions and kinetics for systems containing transition metal elements (Zhao and Truhlar 2008; Zhao et al. 2014). Open shell systems were treated using unrestricted density functional theory. Geometry optimizations were performed using a standard valence LACVP* basis set as implemented in the Spartan Molecular Modelling program (Wave function 2010). For the first- and second-row elements, LACVP implies a 6-31G double-ξ basis set. For the zinc atoms, LACVP uses a nonrelativistic effective core potential (LACVP* uses the 6-31G* basis set for all light elements and the Hay-Wadt ECP and basis set for Zn; see: Hay and Wadt 1985a, b; Wadt and Hay 1985), where the valence part is essentially of double-ξ quality. The starting geometries of the molecular systems were constructed using Spartan’s graphical model builder and minimized interactively using the sybyl force field (Clark et al. 1989). Local minima were optimized using the Spartan ‘10 v1.1.0 Molecular Modelling program (Wave function 2010). A normal mode of analysis was performed to verify the nature of the stationary point and equilibrium geometries were characterized by the absence of imaginary frequencies. The transition state structures were located by series of constrained geometry optimization in which the breaking bonds were fixed at various lengths and optimized the remaining internal coordinates. The approximate stationary points located from such a procedure were then fully optimized using the standard transition state optimization procedure in Spartan (Aniagyei et al. 2013). All first-order saddle points were shown to have an imaginary vibrational frequency along the reaction coordinate.

The rate constants were computed using the transition state theory for the selected reaction pathways (Benson 1960; Glasstone et al. 1941) and assuming that the transmission coefficient, κ is equal to 1.

$${\text{k}}_{\text{uni}} = \left( {\frac{{\kappa {\text{k}}_{\text{B}} {\text{T}}}}{\text{h}}} \right)\exp \left( {\frac{{\Delta {\text{G}}^{\ddag } }}{\text{RT}}} \right)$$

(1)

$${\text{K}}_{\text{eq}} = { \exp }({-}\Delta {\text{G}}^{\text{o}} /{\text{RT}})$$

(2)

The recombination rate constants (k_rec) from the kinetics is

$${\text{k}}_{\text{rec}} = {\text{ K}}_{\text{eq}} \times {\text{k}}_{\text{uni}}$$

(3)

where ΔG^‡ is the Gibbs free activation energy, ΔG^o is the Gibbs free energy, and k_B and h are the Boltzmann and Planck constants, respectively.

Mechanistic considerations

The reaction pathways for the gas phase decomposition of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor were based on the schemes suggested by Opoku et al. (2014, 2015a, b) and Akhtar et al. (2011). The species considered are (1) the dissociation of ZnSe, (2) the dissociation of ZnS, and (3) the heterogeneous P–S and P–Se bond cleavages to form a ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x. These have been presented in Schemes 1, 2, 3 and 4. The activation and reaction free energies were computed at T = 800K.

Scheme 1

Proposed decomposition pathway of (C₆H₅)P(Se)S–Zn–Se intermediate.

Scheme 2

Proposed decomposition pathway of (C₆H₅)P(Se)S–Zn–S intermediate.

Scheme 3

Proposed decomposition pathway of (C₆H₅)₂P(Se)S–Zn intermediate.

Scheme 4

Proposed decomposition pathway of (C₆H₅)P(Se)S–Zn intermediate.

Results and discussion

Optimized Geometry of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor

Table 1 lists the bond angles and bond lengths of the Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor. The geometry at the zinc atom is distorted tetrahedral. The Zn–Se bond lengths, 2.50 Å, are slightly longer than the Zn–S distance, 2.43 Å. The S–Zn–Se angle (89.50° and 89.53°) is smaller than the S–P–Se angle (108.5°) due to the large amount of repulsion between the lone pairs of electrons of phosphorus with those of zinc. The wider S–Zn–Se bond angle of 120.5° was as a result of the proximity of the non-coordinating S- and Se-donor atoms to the Zn(II) atom. The geometrical parameters are in reasonable agreement with theoretically determined data on Zn[(ⁱPr)₂PSSe]₂ precursor (Opoku et al. 2015b).

Table 1 Comparison of the calculated geometries of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ and Zn[(ⁱPr)₂PSSe]₂ precursor at the M06/LACVP* level of theory (bond lengths in angstroms and bond angles in degrees)

Overall decomposition of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor

Relative energies for all species postulated to be involved in the reaction mechanism of the decomposition of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor in Schemes 1 and 2 are depicted in Figures 2 and 3. The geometries of all molecular structures taking part in the reactions under investigation were fully and independently optimized using analytical gradients at the M06 levels with the LACVP* basis set. At each level of theory the potential energy surface was explored independently for the possible existence of transition states and intermediate complexes. The calculated lengths of the dissociation of Zn–Se and Zn–S bonds are 2.94 and 3.13 Å for TS6/s and, 2.93 and 2.94 Å for TS8/s. On the other hand, the calculated lengths of Zn–Se and P–S bonds are 3.28 and 3.13 Å, respectively for TS7/s. In TS9/s the dissociation of Zn–S and P–Se bonds are 3.31 and 3.29 Å. All the complexes retain symmetry of the C₁ point group.

Figure 2

Energy profile of the decomposition pathway of (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate. Data in the path are the relative Gibbs free energies (in kcal/mol and bond distances in Å) obtained at M06/LACVP* level of theory.

Figure 3

Energy profile of the decomposition pathway of (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–S intermediate. Data in the path are the relative Gibbs free energies (in kcal/mol and bond distances in Å) obtained at M06/LACVP* level of theory.

The calculated Gibbs free energy of activation and reaction energy necessary for the formation of the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–SeSP(C₆H₅) intermediate on the double potential energy surface through a singlet transition state TS1/s are +44.12 and +32.10 kcal/mol, respectively. The consequent decomposition of the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–SeSP(C₆H₅) intermediate through singlet transition state TS2/d requires a barrier of +27.77 kcal/mol (Figure 2) and a reaction energy of −8.80 kcal/mol to form the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate. It is possible for the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate to decompose in two ways. On the singlet surface, the decomposition of the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–SeSP(C₆H₅) intermediate to form the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–S intermediate has an activation barrier of +28.49 kcal/mol and reaction energy of −2.59 kcal/mol. The formation of the singlet (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate by the dissociation of a phenyl radical from the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate through the doublet transition state requires an activation barrier of +56.24 kcal/mol and reaction energy of −4.01 kcal/mol. A singlet (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–S intermediate has been found to be 12.89 kcal/mol more stable than the C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate.

The subsequent decomposition of the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate through a singlet transition state to form ZnSe + [(C₆H₅)PSeS]⁻ has an activation barrier of +68.86 kcal/mol (Figure 2) while the decomposition of the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate through a singlet transition state to form ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x + [(C₆H₅)PSe]⁻ has a barrier of +75.87 kcal/mol. In a related study on the gas phase decomposition of Zn[(ⁱPr)₂PSSe]₂ precursor, Opoku et al. (2015b) found the activation barrier for the formation of ZnSe and ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x to be +56.22 and +67.34 kcal/mol (Table 2).

Table 2 Calculated activation barriers and reaction energy of the last step of the various reactions of the Zn[(C₆H₅)PSSe]₂ and Zn[(ⁱPr)₂PSSe] ^b₂ complexes

Deposition rates from the phenyl phosphinato complex, Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ have been observed to be lower than those from the isopropyl phosphinato complex. These differences are attributed to the higher dissociation energy of the P–C bond in phenyl phosphinato complex and also greater electron withdrawing nature of the phenyl substituent, as compared to isopropyl. The higher activation energy for phenyl phosphinato is consistent with cleavage of the stronger phosphinato P–C bond before or during the rate-determining step of the deposition process (Table 2).

Thus, the overall barrier for the decomposition of the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–Se intermediate to give the ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x is higher than the activation barrier for the ZnSe formation pathway. The reaction which would lead back to the reactant is energetically less favourable due to the larger barrier. The ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x dissociation pathway is only 7.79 kcal/mol more stable than the ZnSe dissociation pathway. Moreover, it is possible for the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–S intermediate to decompose in two ways. The formation of the singlet ZnS + [(C₆H₅)PSeS]⁻ through a singlet transition state has an activation barrier of +80.12 kcal/mol and a reaction energy of −2.74 kcal/mol. The formation of singlet ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x + [(C₆H₅)PS]⁻ through the singlet transition state by the dissociation of the Zn–S₂ and Zn–Se₁ bonds from the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–S intermediate has an activation barrier of +66.96 kcal/mol and reaction energy of −15.22 kcal/mol.

In study of the decomposition of Zn[(ⁱPr)₂PSSe]₂ precursor, Opoku et al. (2015b) found the ZnS dissociation pathway to be the most favourable pathway. However, in this work the dissociation of ternary ZnSe_xS_1–x is kinetically more favourable than the ZnSe and ZnS dissociation pathways but the reaction is slow by the highest activation barrier. The barrier along this pathway is +8.91 and +13.16 kcal/mol lower than the ZnSe and ZnS dissociation pathway, respectively. Ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x formed from the optimization of the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn–S intermediate is the most stable species on the reaction PES; the corresponding unimolecular and equilibrium rate constants are 3.05 × 10⁻⁹/s and 8.19 × 10¹ cm³/mol, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Calculated rate constants for the gas phase decomposition of Zn[(C₆H₅)PSSe]₂ at 800K

The initial decomposition of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor was further explored on the doublet PES (i.e. TS-[10-13] in Scheme 3). The energy profile of the gas phase decomposition of the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn intermediate and the optimized structures involved in the reaction mechanisms are shown in Figure 4. Density functional theory (DFT) optimisation shows that Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ can have a singlet ground-state electronic structure for the products and a doublet electronic ground-state structure for the intermediate, (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn. The Zn–S and P–Se bonds increases from 2.42 and 2.21 Å in the reactant (INT6/d) to 2.93 and 3.01 Å in the transition state (TS11/d) while the Zn–Se and P–S bonds increases from 2.48 and 2.04 Å in the reactant to 3.26 and 3.14 Å in the transition state (TS12/d). Also in TS13/d optimised structure, the P–Se and P–S bonds increases from 2.21 and 2.04 Å in the reactant to 3.34 and 3.45 Å in the transition state.

Figure 4

Energy profile of the decomposition pathway of (C₆H₅)₂P(Se)S–Zn intermediate. Data in the path are the relative Gibbs free energies (in kcal/mol and bond distances in Å) obtained at M06/LACVP* level of theory.

The decomposition of the Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ to give the doublet (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn intermediate through the singlet transition state has an activation barrier and reaction energy of +47.29 and +38.12 kcal/mol, respectively. The decomposition of the doublet four-membered (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn intermediate to form ZnSe + [(C₆H₅)₂PS]⁻ has an activation barrier of +17.71 kcal/mol and a reaction energy of −47.89 kcal/mol while the decomposition of the doublet four-membered (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn intermediate to form ZnS + [(C₆H₅)₂PSe]⁻ has an activation barrier of +22.18 kcal/mol and a reaction energy of −40.74 kcal/mol. The formation of ZnSe through the dissociation of Zn–S and P–Se bonds from (ⁱPr)₂PSSe–Zn intermediate (TS11/s in Scheme 3) which was reported in the work of Opoku et al. (2015b) has been found to have a barrier and reaction energy of +0.82 and −28.57 kcal/mol, respectively on the singlet surface.

Also, the formation of the ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x + [(C₆H₅)₂P]⁻ through direct dissociation of the P–Se₁ and P₁–S₁ from the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn intermediate has an activation barrier of +12.09 kcal/mol and a reaction energy of −58.63 kcal/mol. The barrier along this route is only 5.62 kcal/mol lower than the barrier for the ZnSe formation pathway. The activation barriers for the formation of the singlet ZnSe and ZnS (17.71 and 22.18 kcal/mol) are higher than the activation barrier for the formation of ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x. Moreover, this decomposition pathway has the lowest activation free-energy barrier and will proceed very rapidly; the corresponding unimolecular and recombination rate constant are 3.20 × 10⁻¹/s and 3.47 × 10¹⁴ cm³/mol/s, respectively, see Table 3. Thus overall, the formation of ZnSe and ZnS by the decomposition of the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn intermediate cannot compete favourably, both kinetically and thermodynamically with the ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x formation pathway.

The energies as well as the optimized molecular structures obtained for the formation of ZnSe, ZnS and ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x from the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn intermediate in Scheme 4 are summarized in Figure 5. Density functional theory (DFT) optimisation of the reactant (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn shows that (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn can have a singlet ground-state electronic structure for the products and a doublet electronic ground-state structure for the intermediate, (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn. The optimised geometry of the transition state (TS) structure reveals that the Zn–S bond elongates from 2.17 to 3.22 Å (TS15/s) and the P–Se bond lengthens from 2.36 to 3.28 (TS15/s) and 2.36 to 3.15 Å (TS17/s) while the optimised TS structure reveals that the Zn–Se bond elongates from 2.26 to 3.34 Å (TS16/s) and the P–S bond lengthens from 2.17 to 3.13 (TS16/s) and 2.17 to 2.92 Å (TS17/s). The (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn intermediate is 3.72 kcal/mol exergonic. The singlet transition state TS15/s leading to the formation of ZnSe + [C₆H₅PS]⁻ from the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn intermediate is 7.49 kcal/mol above the reactant. The formation of the ZnS + [C₆H₅PSe]⁻ through the singlet transition state TS16/s by the abstraction of Zn–Se₁ and P₁–S₁ bonds from the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn intermediate is exergonic by 21.66 kcal/mol and has an activation barrier of +38.54 kcal/mol (Figure 5). The dissociation of P₁–Se₁ and P₁–S₂ bonds from the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn intermediate through a singlet transition state TS17/s leads to the formation of ternary ZnSe_xS_1–x + [C₆H₅P]⁻. This pathway has an activation barrier of +24.32 kcal/mol and the resulting product (P10/s) is −33.15 kcal/mol; 6.73 and 11.49 kcal/mol more stable than the ZnSe and ZnS dissociation pathway, respectively. Figure 5 shows that the dissociation of P₁−Se₁ and P₁–S₂ bonds from the (C₆H₅)PSSe–Zn complex to form the ternary ZnSe_xS_1−x has a lower activation barrier than the ZnSe and ZnS dissociation pathway. A rate constants of 1.52 × 10⁻³/s, 1.21 × 10⁻¹ cm³/mol and 1.84 × 10⁻⁴ cm³/mol/s were estimated for this process (Table 3).

Figure 5

Energy profile of the decomposition pathway of (C₆H₅)P(Se)S–Zn intermediate. Data in the path are the relative Gibbs free energies (in kcal/mol and bond distances in Å) obtained at M06/LACVP* level of theory.

Spin density

The spin density distribution map of the gas phase decomposition of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ single-source precursor and its species has been explored at the same level of theory reported herein. Figure 6a shows a spin density distributed only on one half of the thioselenophosphinate ligand with little/no zinc contribution. The spin density is also symmetrically delocalized on the phenyl group. In Figure 6b the spin density is exclusively distributed on the selenium atom at both side of the ligand. The spin density map in Figure 6c resembles that of a d-orbital with a large positive spin density at the sulphur atom. Figure 6d shows a strong zinc contribution with a positive spin density localized on the bridging ligand.

Figure 6

Spin-density distribution for a (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–SeSP(C₆H₅), b (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–S, c (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–Se and d (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn complexes. Isosurfaces ±0.003 a.u.

As shown in Figure 7a, d, the spin density is entirely localized on the bridging ligand. Additional spin density is symmetrically delocalized on the phenyl group with little or no metal contribution (Figure 7a, c).

Figure 7

Spin-density distribution for a (C₆H₅)₂PSSeZnSe…SP(C₆H₅), b (C₆H₅)₂PSSeZnS…SeP(C₆H₅), c C₆H₅…(C₆H₅)PSSeZnSe and d C₆H₅…(C₆H₅)PSSeZnS complexes. Isosurfaces ±0.003 a.u.

Figure 8a–d show a positive spin distributed on both the ligand and the metal atom with an exception of (C₆H₅)PS.ZnSe complex which shows no metal contribution. Figure 8a, b, d show the same distribution of delocalization of positive spin on the phenyl group.

Figure 8

Spin-density distribution for a (C₆H₅)₂P…ZnSeS, b (C₆H₅)₂PSe…ZnS, c (C₆H₅)₂PS…ZnSe and d C₆H₅…(C₆H₅)PSSeZn complex. Isosurfaces ±0.003 a.u.

Orbital analysis

The single occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) analysis of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ single-source precursor and its species has been explored. In Figure 9a, c the electron density at the metal atom resembles that of dxy-orbital. The SOMO of (C₆H₅)₂P(Se)S–Zn intermediate shows a distribution of electron density on both the metal and the ligand, predominantly on the zinc atom. In Figure 9b, the electron density is entirely distributed on the selenium atom with no metal and sulphur contribution.

Figure 9

Singly occupied molecular orbitals for a (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–SeSP(C₆H₅), b (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–S, c (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–Se and d (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn complexes. Isosurfaces ±0.032 a.u.

The SOMO in Figure 10a–d show an electron density distribution exclusively on the bridging ligand with no zinc contribution.

Figure 10

Singly occupied molecular orbitals for a (C₆H₅)₂PSSeZnSe…SP(C₆H₅), b (C₆H₅)₂PSSeZnS…SeP(C₆H₅), c C₆H₅…(C₆H₅)PSSeZnSe and d C₆H₅…(C₆H₅)PSSeZnS complexes. Isosurfaces ±0.032 a.u.

Conclusion

In summary, we have studied the structural, electronic, kinetic and thermodynamic properties of Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor using the M06 method. Several possible pathways for the Zn[(C₆H₅)₂PSSe]₂ precursor and its subsequent decomposition emanating from (C₆H₅)PSSe–Pb–Se, (C₆H₅)PSSe–Pb–S, (C₆H₅)₂P(Se)S–Pb and (C₆H₅)P(Se)S–Pb intermediates have been examined at T = 800K. According to our calculated results, the main conclusions are summarized as follows:

• 1. Pathways initiated via the formation of a ZnSe abstraction from the (C₆H₅)P(Se)S–Pb intermediate is competitive with the pathways that lead to the formation of ZnS.

• 2. Kinetically and thermodynamically the most favourable pathway involves the formation of ternary ZnSe_xS_1–x on both the singlet and doublet potential energy surfaces.

• 3. The initial dissociation of phenyl radical to form the (C₆H₅)₂PSSe–Zn–SeSP(C₆H₅) intermediate is kinetically only 3.47 kcal/mol lower than the [(C₆H₅)₂PS]⁻ dissociation to form the (C₆H₅)₂P(Se)S–Pb intermediate.

• 4. The isopropyl precursor appears to be more preferable to the phenyl precursor due to its high growth rate at their mutual deposition temperature.

• 5. The spin density map and single occupied molecular orbital analysis shows that it is mainly the coordinating Se- and S-donor atoms that provides the spin and electron contribution.